Message boards : Number crunching : NPU inclusion?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
KLiK Send message Joined: 1 Apr 14 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,611,607 RAC: 1 |
Few words about future of tech & NPUs? What do you know? What do you think? Is NPU going to be included into R@h? What about some other project? Will it be limited to CPU-NPU (like intel or AMD) or will it include some other NPU devices? Such as Googles Tensor & Coral TPU/NPU? Falcon cards? Lets start the discussion here... non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia, EU |
|
Toby Broom Send message Joined: 15 Oct 08 Posts: 11 Credit: 18,751,389 RAC: 156 |
BOINC doesn't support yet, it looks like it will be included in the next version. https://github.com/BOINC/boinc/issues/5361 |
[VENETO] bobovizSend message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 2163 Credit: 13,128,944 RAC: 8,427 |
Few words about future of tech & NPUs? What do you know? What do you think? I don't know if NPU will be useful for Rosetta@Home, 'cause NPU are doing very specific calculations. NPU uses, at most, matrix (FP8/FP16 or INT8) operations and Rosetta uses, for what i know, FP32 (or FP64) If it is correct, to "adapt" R@H to an NPU cpu requests a deep re-thinking (and re-writing) of the code. And, in these years, is almost impossible for this project. Maybe project like Axiom will benefit from NPU |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
NPU inclusion?
©2026 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org